May I ask the editor what does the term "released" mean in this context? Wouldn't it be better to describe it that way: "Hidden & veiled only like a sample..."? Do I really need to draw your attention to the fact that there are only 2 copies existing, and that there are already 9 longing individuals would like to own it while there is just one (you) who got the (whole) bread first!!!??? Does this make any sense?Are there any plans to release this item in an honest way in the future?Wouldn‘t it be better to wait until a real item is released and than to think of connecting it with your item as the first step in a development process, as a detail of a release that more than 2 people (incl. the maker!) know???Anyway, up to now this stand alone contribution is wasted data rubbish, I assume.

Discogs means Discography and included the records that are made like test pressing in a large different kind of formats, discography registered that the record exist not that it's strictly a commercial release, I think it is important for who collect records know that a record exist and have a correct description of the release, one day from many way he can have the record in his hand, so he know what is it. Really this record was cutted in three, not in two copies, two are the records we gave to David. This is only a test of materials for a possible future release done by Coptic Cat (not by us), as we have designed other releases for Durtro many years ago. That's all, there's nothing of strange. We love records and designed them and one day, if it's possible, we will like to do it in a million copies!

exacly !I'm just waiting for someone to start adding to the database original master tapes that exist in just one copies and are kept in the studios :|